Music : The Thing About Men (2003 Original Off-Broadway Cast) |
|
|

Rating: - * Disappointing ... After falling head over heels for I Love You, You're Perfect I was very excited to hear this album, but it was a complete disappointment. I didn't find myself falling in love with characters or songs, or even caring to follow the story. The singers are OK; the lyrics fall flat at almost every turn; and the story is a snore. I would not suggest this for anyone except the collectors. Favorite song: "The Better Man Won" Rating: - * Clever and entertaining ... I picked up this CD in a bargain bin at a discount store, was dissappointed when I read the other two reviews. However, I disagreed with both after listening. I thought the songs were delightful, delivered by an excellent singing cast. Lyrics were very clever. This show ran off-Broadway for 222 performances before this recording was made, so it had to have something going for it. Rating: - * What's this \"Thing About Men\"? ... Must agree with MingBing "melly"- this was a disappointing CD. Picked it up as a lark along with SUNDOWN and THE IMMIGRANT (needless to say, I enjoy hearing something new.) MEN just didn't cut it for me. Lackluster score with only the occasional bright spots, which were not enough to win me over. (How did this show ever run in NYC?) Of the three CDs, SUNDOWN is the only one I listen to on a regular basis (and why hasn't this show been done in NYC?) Rating: - * Disappointing. ... I bought this random CD cos I thought I'd never go wrong with a musical recording but this one was a disappointment. I just want to fall in love with an album at a first listen but this one didn't do it for me. It lacks catchy songs. And it seemed a little short. Save your money for something better. ETA: 'Downtown Bohemian Slum' sounds like a ripoff of 'Mountain Town' from Southpark. Rating: - * TERRIBLE! ... This had to be on of the worst shows I have ever listened to! I baught it because I love you,your perfect, now change is one of my fav. shows, however this one was just terrible. Not funny, long, boring, the vocaals are terrible dont waste your money! |

Critics and audiences didn't seem too happy with Back to the Future, Part II, the inventive, perhaps too clever sequel. Director Zemeckis and cast bent over backwards to add layers of time-travel complication, and while it surely exercises the brain it isn't necessarily funny in the same way that its predecessor was. It's well worth a visit, though, just to appreciate the imagination that went into it, particularly in a finale that has Marty watching his own actions from the first film. --Tom Keogh
Shot back-to-back with the second chapter in the trilogy, Back to the Future, Part III is less hectic than that film and has the same sweet spirit of the first, albeit in a whole new setting. This time, Marty ends up in the Old West of 1885, trying to prevent the death of mad scientist Christopher Lloyd at the hands of gunman Buford "Mad Dog" Tannen (Thomas F. Wilson, who had a recurring role as the bully Biff). Director Zemeckis successfully blends exciting special effects with the traditions of a Western and comes up with something original and fun. --Tom Keogh


